tragedi-double-six-tragis-buat-sabah

NO ….. Kuli, YOU ARE NOT! u r implicated in the murder of Tun Fuad n his newly elected cabinet in the 1976 (June 6) Sabah Double 6 tragedy. no way can u profess Najib’s line “I didn’t know”.

immediately after Sabah fell to the opposition in the Sabah 1976 election, u n Hussein Onn (the then PM) hatched out a plan to regain control of Sabah. Tun Razak had just died on 14 Jan 1976. foremost on Tun Hussein Onn’s mind was the domino effect….that other states wud follow suit in the next GE in 1978. fresh in his mind was the 1969 opp victory. the Razak-Onn dynasty was in a real danger of falling n Spore under LKY making a return to Msia.

but how to lure Tun Fuad n his closest ministers into a trap, the quickest n surest way? the plot was to use Ku Li to meet w Tun Fuad n his ministers at Labuan …. not in KK, the capital of Sabah.

an ex-RMAF service technician was asked to resign n be transferred to MAS-labuan airport for Tun Fuad’s return flight sabotage. he was promised huge rewards. 1 yr later he was put on the same fateful flight (MH653) together w Hussein Onn’s nephew who also worked for MAS. Hussein ONn was fearful the Rakyat wud ask him to take responsibility of MAS’s 1st major airline crash, n resign. that wud defeat all purpose of the Sabah Double 6 plot right ….which was to preserve the Razak-Onn dynastic rule over Msia (at whatever cost). hence, by putting his nephew on the fateful plane, he wud kill 2 birds w 1 stone. gain enough Rakyat’s sympathy for his nephew’s death n to blame the “fictitious Japanese Red Army hijack”.

Kuli was Razak’s blue-eye boy. he wud agree to anything Razak or Hussein Onn asked of him.

but why did they need to crash MH653?

1. they needed to get rid of that ex-RMAF-MAS technician who rigged the Double Six crash a year earlier. an air crash and the dead “only key-witness” wud bury the dark secrets of the 197666 tragedy forever. but they were too late. some details leaked out earlier. but still a judiciary system controlled by them, wud stop any demand for truth ….. in the absence of internet social media n FB.

2. Hussein Onn needed to get rid of his own DPM Mahathir. it is a known fact Hussein did not like Mahathir. he only tolerated Mahathir bcos of Tun Razak. his own failing health, means he needed to get rid of Mahathir fast n appt his nephew, Najib Razak as his DPM. that way the PM throne wud not accidentally fall into Mahathir’s hand.

3. Ku Li, many years later, revealed that he rejected Hussein Onn’s offer to be his DPM in March 1976 (a delay of > 6 weeks). that was also a lie. Hussein cud not make Ku Li his deputy n then asked Ku Li to step down a year later, to make way for Najib. Nepotism wud then be very very obvious. Hussein Onn liked Ku Li too much to kill him. there’s also another reason. Ku li is a royalty. once he gets to the PM throne, there’s no telling Ku Li wud continue with the Kelantan royal dynasty rule n the end of Razak-Onn dynasty. Najib wud never make it on his own after Hussein’s death.

4. for the MH653 crash-plot, Hussein needed Spore’s help. Sabah’s 17666 crash cud be blamed on technical malfunction. but another crash the following year ….wud be too much of a coincidence. LKY agreed to crash MH653 in Spore airspace ( a false promise). after the failed 1969 opp victory to control Msia’s opp parties (as a prelude to reentering Msia) …. bcos Tun Razak pre-empted it with Mei-13 riot), LKY was looking for a way to get back to Msia or at least make Msia less hostile to Spore (guaranteed Spore’s survival n cheap water supply).

5. LKY readily offered to be an accomplice to the Mass Murder crime. LKY also wanted to get rid of Mahathir ….. a brilliant, strongly independent ultra-Malay nationalist (bcos of his Indian ancestry). LKY was right ….. that a Msia controlled by Mahathir, wud be difficult to mold n control. LKY also wanted Najib to be the 4th PM after Hussein but for his own selfish reasons.

6. LKY back stabbed Hussein Onn. Instead of crashing the plane within Spore’s territory, LKY secretly ordered the plane to be shot down using the USN newly developed secret military weapon, DEW laser. LKY didn’t want a plane crash to mar Spore’s aviation clean record. the USN warship was in Spore’s territorial waters, just off Tuas.

7.Hussein Onn was pretty upset with MH653 plot went wrong but cud not take it out openly w LKY, w/o being implicated n forced to resign as well. MH653 crashed at Tg Kupang. Mahathir, the primary target was not in the victims’ list. the agricultural minister took Mahathir’s place to accompany the Cuban Ambassador on that fateful flight. Mahathir was still his DPM.

8. the failed objectives got PM Hussein even more sick. he was in n out of the hospital n had no choice but delegate Mahathir as the acting PM in his absence. after 2 years, Hussein Onn had no choice but to resign bcos of ill-health.

the rest is open book history. so Ku Li u r just as bad as Hussein Onn in the mass murder of Sabah’s duly elected CM n DUNs. Harris Salleh of course, was rewarded with the CM post n Ku Li stuck in the FM post n the lie that he alighted from that fateful plane at the last minute bcos he was invited by Harris Salleh to see his “COWS” (alamak of all things cows? …… moooo!)

Advertisements
Comments
  1. Peter Taylor says:

    If indeed it is as you say Selva,

    Sabah may have been duped into believing PH would be a better alternative in fulfilling our key demands on MA63 esp oil and gas as well as 40% state rights on federal revenue in the state.

    Oil and gas constitute about 30% of Federal annual income, without which the Federal Government and many dependent states in West Msia would go bankrupt.

    If the 40% Sabah and Sarawak entitlement were to be implemented, Federal income would be further reduced. Therefore we believe Tun Mahathir would not be in a mood to comply with the Sabah and Sarawak demands. Petronas devision to sue the Sarawak Government came from him as the Prime Minister. Tun Mahathir knows Sarawak has no power to legally enforce State rights on oil and gas without Federal cooperation.

    Tun Mahathir knows this very well. He did not come to Sabah during the general election so he did not promise anything and he is under no obligation to answer for DAP and PKR election promises to Sabah and Sarawak.

    Bob, we have supported PH at the Federal or Parliamentary level. We have issued statements in support of PH manifesto we consider attractive and convincing. But we are detecting something that merit further observation. Allow me to play the role of devil advocate here to help us think and strategize how to respond in future.

    PH has played out the alleged RM1 trillion debt obviously with motives. We think the trillion debt claim will justify not implementing PH 100-day promises. We think the trillion debt would be a perfect justification not to honor election promises especially to Sabah and Sarawak.

    To further spice up their trillion debt claim, the new Federal Government has came up with a brilliant plan or rather political gimmick.

    First, they announce 10% wage cut to all Federal Ministers. We wonder what would a few hundreds thousands monthly savings do to alleviate the national debts. Poor remuneration among cabinet ministers will embolden some to create opportunities for themselves to make ends meet.

    Second, they announced setting up of Tabung Harapan to make citizens pay for the trillion debts. YB Lim Kit Siang has been assigned as the OH salesperson to promote Tabung Harapan. The truth is this political gimmick would not solve the trillion debt. We would have expected the Federal Government to announce innovative fiscal and budgetary policies or to restructure the economy and overall financial system to improve our debt burden. We are yet to see anything. We hope they do.

    In any case, Tabung Harapan would pay for the financial shortfall due to PH promises to cancel PTPTN loan owed by borrowers with less than RM4000.00 income.

    Third, one wonders why Lim Guan Eng was appointed Finance Minister. Actually this was a brilliant idea. There is more support for DAP to clean up the mess left by the kleptocracy regime. But we wonder if Guan Eng would be set up as a scape goat for PH failure to honor election promises to Sabah and Sarawak.

    We think the appointment of 5 WS into the Federal Cabinet is good. But these Sabah leaders would be judged not on the basis of their position as Cabinet Ministers but rather their ability to steer the Federal Government in the right direction to fulfill Sabah and Sarawak aspiration on MA63 and other state rights.

    Like

  2. Tausug Power says:

    Mr Joe Fernzthegreat, The discretionary power of a constitutional TYT to appoint CM is defined by law. While TYT can use his discretionary power to appoint CM, he has no power to decide whether or not a CM has lost his majority. This will hv to be decided by the Assembly itself. TYT cannot usurp the power of the Assembly or make his own conclusion and then influence the turn of events.

    The issue is not about Musa Aman or Shapie Apdal, but the rule of law.

    If Musa wins his case, he will be back as CM and govern with a minority government till 12 October 2018, the last day Assembly should convene to comply with the 120 days requirement.

    Even with a minority government, as a lawful CM he will hv the right to reconvene his cabinet and reappoint the six nominated assemblymen.

    He will hv the right to restructure his government and restore legislative support within few months until the next Assembly sits.

    GB has 21 ADUN versus 39 for WS Group. The 6 nominated will change if Musa wins his case.

    Total Assembly is 66 (60 plus 6). Musa needs 34 to stay in power. But Shapie is firmly in control with 45.

    Assuming Musa wins his case and reappoint 6 nominated assemblymen, he will have 27 Assemblymen. He will need only 7 more to defect to him. Does Musa has the capacity to win over 7 or more state YBs?

    Unless Musa can convince 7 or more to defect to him, he will be voted out by the Assembly in its next sitting.

    Musa might try to dissolve the Assembly but the power to consent or not consent lies with the TYT. So dissolution of the state Assembly is not probable.

    It would be interesting to watch how Sabah politics unfold itself in the next few days.

    Like

  3. Is Mahathir going to say, “HiHiHi”, or open investigations into double six?

    Like

Hey, hey! What have you got to say?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.