2013 Budget fails to address three crucial areas – Fiscal Prudence, Economic Sustainability and Cost of Living Increases

Posted: September 30, 2012 in DAP, Lim Guan Eng, Malaysian Economics, Penang
Tags: , ,

by Lim Guan Eng

Even though many goodies where announced during yesterday’s Budget 2013 speech by Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, this budget has failed the Malaysian people by not addressing three crucial areas which are necessary to guarantee the long term well-being of our country and its people – namely fiscal prudence, economic sustainability and cost of living increases.

Firstly, even though the budget deficit is projected to come down from 4.5% in 2012 to a ‘mere’ 4.0% in 2013, this figure masks the poor track record of the BN government in sticking to its spending plans. For example, total expenditure for Budget 2012 was announced at RM232.8b in last’s year’s budget speech. But in this year’s Economic Report 2012 / 2013, total expenditure for 2012 is projected to total up to RM252.4b. This is almost RM20b more than the projected expenditure announced last year.

We were fortunate that projected revenue is expected to be RM207b for 2012, RM20b more than the RM186.9b projected revenue announced last year. Without this tax ‘windfall’, our budget deficit would have ballooned up to 6.7% of GDP rather than the projected 4.5% for 2012. But we cannot expect that actual revenue will continue to exceed projected revenue especially given the slowing global economy. Furthermore revenue from oil related tax revenue is likely to decrease given the change in the dividend policy of Petronas as well as political uncertainty in Southern Sudan which could decrease Petronas’s bottom line by as much as US1 billion.

While we do not object to giving financial assistance to the truly deserving, there is nothing to indicate that the government has stopped leakages in the BR1M program which went to people like an MCA Datuk in Pahang. The initial RM1.8b that was allocated to BR1M for 3.4m households in the 2012 budget ballooned to over RM2b for over 4m households. A country whose GDP is projected to expand by 5% in 2012 should see fewer households earning less than 3000RM. And yet, BR1M recipients are projected to increase to 4.3m households with another 2.7m individuals earning less than 2000RM joining them. Without proper checks and balances, the RM3b that has been allocated to BR1M 2.0 for Budget 2013 can easily increase to more than RM4b, if not more.
The same lack of fiscal prudence could be seen in the expenditure on subsidies. An allocation of RM32.8b was given for subsidies in Budget 2012 but the actual expenditure on subsidies is projected to be at RM42.4b, an increase of RM9.6b or 29.3% over the original budget! If the same kind of trajectory is followed, the RM37.6b which is allocated for subsidies in Budget 2013 could easily increase to almost RM50b!

Given the BN’s poor record for fiscal prudence and especially if elections are held next year, it is likely that BN will break the bank to funnel out as much taxpayer’s money as possible in a blatant attempt to buy votes by giving handouts irresponsibly. I would not be surprised if our total expenditure will be RM30b over budget and our budget deficit for 2013 would end up well in excess of 5.0%!

Secondly, this budget provides incentives and handouts which favors certain projects and parties rather than providing the basis for longer term sustainable economic growth that will benefit all. In fact, many of these incentives will skew the system against hardworking Malaysian entrepreneurs who are not in the position to receive and benefit from these incentives.

For example, Budget 2013 continues to give preferred incentives and tax treatments for companies who want to locate to and developers who want to build in the Tun Razak Exchange formerly known as the Kuala Lumpur International Financial District (KLIFD) including tax exemptions for property developers, income tax exemption for 10 years for TRX-status companies, stamp duty exemptions, industrial building allowance and accelerated capital allowances for TRX Marquee-status companies.

The aggressive promotion of TRX not only increases the problem of a property glut in commercial office space in Kuala Lumpur, it also unfairly disadvantages developers who own and are in the process of developing commercial property which TRX is directly competing against. These developers would lose out if existing or future tenants decide to relocate to TRX and at the same time, the taxpayer would also lose out since these companies would be given income tax exemption for 10 years. As part of this initiative, 1MDB will be allocated an additional RM400m from the Prime Minister’s Department in Budget 2013, an unnecessary expenditure for what is essentially a property development project.

Similarly, under the guise of lowering prices of goods in Sabah and Sarawak, the government is introducing 57 Kedai Rakyat 1Malaysia or KR1M stores at the cost of RM386m. Just like in Peninsular Malaysia, the ones who will be hurt by this move are the owners of the kedai runcit stores who cannot compete against the government subsidized KR1M stores. It would make more sense for the government to abolish the cabotage policy and to improve the transportation network in Sabah and Sarawak to reduce prices of goods in Sabah and Sarawak, which is what Pakatan is proposing, rather than to subsidize KR1M stores that are run by one private company which would drive out many existing kedai runcit owners out of business.

These kinds of initiatives contradict PM Najib’s statement that the era of ‘government knows best is over’. Indeed, according to the Economic Report 2012 / 2013, the public sector is expected to expand by 13.3% in 2012 to account for 25.2% of GDP (up from 23.3% in 2011), meaning that the government will play a larger role in the economy, rather than to reduce its footprint and to allow the private sector to thrive and drive the economy forward. By promoting and undertaking these initiatives, Najib is contradicting one of the major thrust of the New Economic Model (NEM) and also the impetus behind the Economic Transformation Program (ETP).
Thirdly, this budget fails to bring to the table long term solutions for the problem of rising cost of living, especially in the urban areas.

Crime is one of the main drivers of cost of living increases. Businesses which have to spend more on security pass the costs to consumers. Residents who have to pay for private security have less disposable income. Sadly, the measures which are in Budget 2013 to reduce crime leave much to be desired.

There are no recommendations to re-organize the police force by re-allocating Special Branch officers, which have twice as many investigating officers / detectives as the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), or by re-allocating some of the 14,000 General Operations Force (GOF) police personnel, an organizational legacy from the Communist fighting days, to the CID and the frontlines of fighting crime.

Instead, what was provided was the allocation of RM20m to buy 1000 motorcycles at a cost of RM20,000 per motorcycle to set up a Motorcycle Patrolling Unit.

In addition, there were hardly any efforts proposed to involve the state and local authorities to fight crime. All that was mentioned as the allocation to buy 496 units of CCTVs for 25 local authorities to prevent street crimes in urban areas. This works out to 20 units of CCTVs for every local authority which is not even sufficient to cover one neighborhood, much less the area in one state authority.

Similarly, the ambitious program to build more than 100,000 affordable and low cost houses will come to naught if these housing projects are not integrated with public transportation. The MRT project and the LRT extension cannot possibly cover all the areas which have or will have low cost and affordable homes, assuming that they even get built. Allowing the state and local authorities to provide bus services would be one possible solution to this problem. But instead of this, the federal government is expanding the federally owned RAPID bus services to other places, this time to Kuantan.

With car prices still at very unaffordable levels, especially for the lower middle income groups, the issue of affordable and low cost housing cannot be seen in isolation from the issue of public transportation. Unfortunately, PM Najib does not seem to have realized this as seen by his Budget 2013.

Pakatan Rakyat’s budget, on the other hand, exercises much more fiscal prudence. Not only is our projected deficit lower at 3.5% of GDP or approximately RM37b, our revenue and expenditure projections are also much more conservative, at RM197b and RM234b respectively. A more conservative budget would give us more room to maneuver if Pakatan does take over power at the federal level and puts its budget in place.

PR’s budget is also more economically sustainable in that we do not attempt to favor one sector or project over another. Instead we will set out to abolish monopolies, abolish unfair practices and increase competition in all sectors of the economy.

Our budget also gives more focus on long term solutions to address cost of living issues including a proper redeployment and reallocation of police personnel to fight crime, more involvement of local authorities to reduce crime and provide public transportation alternatives, reduce and abolish toll rates to put money back into the pockets of the people and to find new ways of providing affordable public housing.

The choice for Malaysians is very clear. Najib’s 2013 budget is full of one shot goodies and handouts which do not adequately address the long term concerns of the country namely fiscal prudence, economic sustainability and cost of living increases. Pakatan, through its Alternative Budget, and through the state governments in Penang and Selangor, have shown that it can govern with fiscal responsibility in mind, with sustainable policies which encourage fair competition and with measures that puts money in the pockets of the people in the long term. Let the people of Malaysia choose wisely.

Lim Guan Eng

Read the rest in Mandarin here

Comments
  1. kings says:

    Dear Sir / Madam,
    Saya seorang pemberi pinjaman uang swasta yang terdaftar. Kami memberikan pinjaman untuk membantu orang,
    perusahaan yang perlu memperbarui status keuangan mereka di seluruh dunia, dengan
    Suku Bunga sangat Minimal tahunan rendah seperti 3% dalam waktu 1 tahun sampai 30 tahun
    pembayaran periode durasi untuk setiap bagian dari dunia. Kami memberikan pinjaman dalam
    kisaran Minimal Lima Ribu Dollar Amerika Serikat ke Satu Juta
    Dollar Amerika Serikat ($ 5000 sampai $ 1.000.000 USD). Pinjaman kami diasuransikan dengan baik
    untuk keamanan maksimum adalah orang priority.Interested kami harus menghubungi kami melalui
    E-mail: gkenferloan@gmail.com
    INFORMASI PERTAMA diperlukan adalah:
    Nama Lengkap: _________
    Negara: _____________
    Alamat: __________________
    Jenis Kelamin: _________________
    Telepon: ______________
    jumlah Needed_______________
    Jangka waktu pinjaman: _______________
    Tujuan pinjaman: _____________
    Penghasilan Bulanan: _________________
    Hubungi E-mail: gkenferloan@gmail.com
    Kontak: Mrs Mary Durand.

    Semua balasan Email ke depan untuk gkenferloan@gmail.com

    Like

  2. this budget has failed the Malaysian people by not addressing three crucial areas which are necessary to guarantee the long term well-being of our country and its people – namely fiscal prudence, economic sustainability and cost of living increases.

    Pendidikan percuma dan penghapusan hutang PTPTN dianggar akan menelan hasil negara sebanyak RM 143 billion (minimum), subsidi minyak dan peningkatan bayaran royalti, RM 42 billion dan tol percuma RM 20 billion.

    Semua sekali menjadikan kos untuk menampung 3 janji Pakatan Rakyat ini sahaja sebanyak RM 205 billion!! Ini belum lagi bercakap tentang subsidi lain dan segala perbelanjaan pembangunan dan pengurusan negara yang dianggarkan antara RM 80 – RM 100 billion setahun.

    Like

  3. this budget has failed the Malaysian people by not addressing three crucial areas which are necessary to guarantee the long term well-being of our country and its people – namely fiscal prudence, economic sustainability and cost of living increases.

    Bagi mengambil alih konsesi tol bagi merealisasikan janji tol percuma pula, kerajaan perlu membayar sebanyak RM 20 billion berdasarkan nilai semasa syarikat pengendali Projek Lebuhraya Utara Selatan (PLUS) yang terdedah semasa pengambil alihan syarikat tersebut oleh Kumpulan UEM dan Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja (KWSP).

    Like

  4. this budget has failed the Malaysian people by not addressing three crucial areas which are necessary to guarantee the long term well-being of our country and its people – namely fiscal prudence, economic sustainability and cost of living increases.

    Manakala bagi menampung kenaikan royalti minyak untuk Sabah dan Sarawak sebanyak 15% lagi (menjadikan 20%) dan bayaran royalti kepada negeri Terengganu dan Kelantan, kosnya dijangka akan mencecah sehingga RM 20 billion. Unjuran ini dibuat berdasarkan nilai 5% royalti minyak yang dibayar kepada Sabah, Sarawak dan Terengganu (termasuk bayaran wang ehsan kepada Kelantan) pada 2011 yang sudah mencecah sehingga RM 10 billion.

    Like

  5. this budget has failed the Malaysian people by not addressing three crucial areas which are necessary to guarantee the long term well-being of our country and its people – namely fiscal prudence, economic sustainability and cost of living increases.

    Bagi menampung subsidi bahan api pula, kerajaan telah membelanjakan sebanyak RM 18 billion untuk subsidi harga bahan api tersebut pada 2011. Anwar masih tidak mengumumkan berapa nilai penurunan harga minyak jika Pakatan Rakyat mengambil alih tapi beruang jangka sekitar RM 0.10 – RM 0.30 seliter. Penurunan ini akan menambah subsidi kerajaan untuk bahan api sahaja sehingga RM 22 billion setahun.

    Like

  6. this budget has failed the Malaysian people by not addressing three crucial areas which are necessary to guarantee the long term well-being of our country and its people – namely fiscal prudence, economic sustainability and cost of living increases.

    Memetik kenyataan Perdana Menteri di Batu Pahat tempoh hari, kerajaan akan kehilangan hasil sebanyak RM 43 billion untuk tujuan menghapuskan pinjaman PTPTN. Untuk membiayai sepenuhnya pengajian di semua Insititusi Pengajian Tinggi Awam (IPTA) dan mengambil alih lebih 500 buah Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Swasta (IPTS) bagi merealisasikan janji perkhidmatan percuma akan memakan belanja sehingga RM 100 billion!!

    Like

  7. this budget has failed the Malaysian people by not addressing three crucial areas which are necessary to guarantee the long term well-being of our country and its people – namely fiscal prudence, economic sustainability and cost of living increases.

    Banyak yang sudah disebut mengenai janji-janji kosong Pakatan Rakyat jika ditakdirkan akhirnya berjaya membentuk kerajaan persekutuan. Keghairahan ‘melafazkan’ janji ini menjadi terlalu hebat sehingga ramai terlupa, berapa nilai semua janji yang disebutkan itu?

    3 janji utama Pakatan Rakyat ini jika akhirnya berjaya memerintah kerajaan persekutuan. Yang paling di atas sudah tentulah janji untuk memberi pendidikan percuma kepada semua rakyat (termasuk penghapusan PTPTN), tol percuma dan subsidi minyak (termasuk menaikkan royalti minyak untuk Sabah dan Sarawak sebanyak 20% dari 5% sekarang).

    Like

  8. I believe that the 2013 Budget can be seen as a continuation of the past three Budgets unveiled by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak since he took office in April 2009.

    Like the previous ones, the 2013 Budget is, in essence, driven by two crucial agendas: to manage the increasing cost of living and to accelerate economic transformation to achieve the goal of becoming a high-income nation by 2020.

    Like

  9. mantera says:

    Sebagaimana yang telah dibentangkan, bajet 2013 akan menyediakan peruntukan sejumlah 251.6 bilion ringgit bagi melaksanakan semua langkah, program dan projek pembangunan, menumpukan kepada kesejahteraan rakyat dan pembangunan negara.

    Like

  10. mantera says:

    Daripada jumlah tersebut, 201.9 bilion ringgit adalah bagi perbelanjaan mengurus dan 49.7 bilion ringgit bagi peruntukan pembangunan.

    Like

  11. jfernandez14@yahoo.co.uk says:

    This is a Bad Bad Budget geared towards bribing the voters into giving the BN yet another five years. It won’t work.

    Sent by DiGi from my BlackBerry® Smartphone

    Like

Hey, hey! What have you got to say?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s